[PATCH] D15005: Fix PR8170: Clang does not check constructor declaration that uses a template-id

[Faisal Vali via cfe-commits]

faisalv added a comment.

*ping* 
My main question is, does it make sense to suppress diagnostics when checking the template-id, and then rewording it as I do.  If it does make sense to suppress and then report a new diagnostic - is my method of suppression a reasonable one (as opposed to SFINAETrap or passing a flag around that's checked prior to emitting a diagnostic)
Thanks!


http://reviews.llvm.org/D15005