[PATCH] D14891: Replace assert with early-out in tryEmitFMulAdd
David Majnemer via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Nov 28 18:46:20 PST 2015
majnemer added a subscriber: majnemer.
majnemer added a comment.
Is it possible to have a test which covers this change?
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp:2568
@@ -2567,1 +2567,3 @@
+ // that does not have any other uses.
if (llvm::BinaryOperator* LHSBinOp = dyn_cast<llvm::BinaryOperator>(op.LHS)) {
+ if (LHSBinOp->getOpcode() == llvm::Instruction::FMul &&
----------------
I'd use `auto *LHSBinOp` here, the type is obvious from the right hand side.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp:2570-2575
@@ -2571,8 +2569,8 @@
+ if (LHSBinOp->getOpcode() == llvm::Instruction::FMul &&
+ LHSBinOp->hasNUses(0))
return buildFMulAdd(LHSBinOp, op.RHS, CGF, Builder, false, isSub);
- }
- } else if (llvm::BinaryOperator* RHSBinOp =
- dyn_cast<llvm::BinaryOperator>(op.RHS)) {
- if (RHSBinOp->getOpcode() == llvm::Instruction::FMul) {
- assert(RHSBinOp->getNumUses() == 0 &&
- "Operations with multiple uses shouldn't be contracted.");
+ }
+ if (llvm::BinaryOperator* RHSBinOp = dyn_cast<llvm::BinaryOperator>(op.RHS)) {
+ if (RHSBinOp->getOpcode() == llvm::Instruction::FMul &&
+ RHSBinOp->hasNUses(0))
return buildFMulAdd(RHSBinOp, op.LHS, CGF, Builder, isSub, false);
----------------
I think `use_empty()` is more canonical than `hasNUses(0)` in this situation.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGExprScalar.cpp:2573
@@ +2572,3 @@
+ }
+ if (llvm::BinaryOperator* RHSBinOp = dyn_cast<llvm::BinaryOperator>(op.RHS)) {
+ if (RHSBinOp->getOpcode() == llvm::Instruction::FMul &&
----------------
Ditto here.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D14891
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list