r254143 - Fix for merging decls in pragma weak
Alexander Musman via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Nov 26 01:34:31 PST 2015
Author: amusman
Date: Thu Nov 26 03:34:30 2015
New Revision: 254143
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=254143&view=rev
Log:
Fix for merging decls in pragma weak
Calling CheckFunctionDeclaration so that 2 decls for the 'weak' are merged.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13048
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/pragma-weak.c
cfe/trunk/test/Sema/pragma-weak.c
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp?rev=254143&r1=254142&r2=254143&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp Thu Nov 26 03:34:30 2015
@@ -5435,17 +5435,22 @@ NamedDecl * Sema::DeclClonePragmaWeak(Na
assert(isa<FunctionDecl>(ND) || isa<VarDecl>(ND));
NamedDecl *NewD = nullptr;
if (FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(ND)) {
- FunctionDecl *NewFD;
- // FIXME: Missing call to CheckFunctionDeclaration().
// FIXME: Mangling?
// FIXME: Is the qualifier info correct?
// FIXME: Is the DeclContext correct?
- NewFD = FunctionDecl::Create(FD->getASTContext(), FD->getDeclContext(),
- Loc, Loc, DeclarationName(II),
- FD->getType(), FD->getTypeSourceInfo(),
- SC_None, false/*isInlineSpecified*/,
- FD->hasPrototype(),
- false/*isConstexprSpecified*/);
+
+ LookupResult Previous(*this, II, Loc, LookupOrdinaryName);
+ LookupParsedName(Previous, TUScope, nullptr, true);
+
+ auto NewFD = FunctionDecl::Create(
+ FD->getASTContext(), FD->getDeclContext(), Loc, Loc,
+ DeclarationName(II), FD->getType(), FD->getTypeSourceInfo(), SC_None,
+ false /*isInlineSpecified*/, FD->hasPrototype(),
+ false /*isConstexprSpecified*/);
+
+ CheckFunctionDeclaration(TUScope, NewFD, Previous,
+ false /*IsExplicitSpecialization*/);
+
NewD = NewFD;
if (FD->getQualifier())
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/pragma-weak.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/pragma-weak.c?rev=254143&r1=254142&r2=254143&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/pragma-weak.c (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGen/pragma-weak.c Thu Nov 26 03:34:30 2015
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
// CHECK-DAG: @mix2 = weak alias void (), void ()* @__mix2
// CHECK-DAG: @a1 = weak alias void (), void ()* @__a1
// CHECK-DAG: @xxx = weak alias void (), void ()* @__xxx
+// CHECK-DAG: @weakfoo = weak alias void {{.*}} @localfoo
@@ -173,6 +174,14 @@ label:
// CHECK: declare extern_weak i32 @PR16705b()
// CHECK: declare extern_weak i32 @PR16705c()
+// In this test case, we have a declaration of weakfoo before #pragma weak.
+// Test that 2 decls for the weakfoo are merged.
+extern void weakfoo();
+void localfoo() { }
+#pragma weak weakfoo=localfoo
+extern void externmain() { return weakfoo(); }
+// CHECK-LABEL: define void @externmain()
+// CHECK: call{{.*}}@weakfoo
///////////// TODO: stuff that still doesn't work
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Sema/pragma-weak.c
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Sema/pragma-weak.c?rev=254143&r1=254142&r2=254143&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Sema/pragma-weak.c (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Sema/pragma-weak.c Thu Nov 26 03:34:30 2015
@@ -9,3 +9,9 @@ void __a3(void) __attribute((noinline));
#pragma weak a3 = __a3 // expected-note {{previous definition}}
void a3(void) __attribute((alias("__a3"))); // expected-error {{redefinition of 'a3'}}
void __a3(void) {}
+
+extern void weak2foo(int); // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}} expected-note {{'weak2foo' declared here}}
+void local2foo(double d1, double d2) { }
+#pragma weak weak2foo=local2foo // expected-error {{conflicting types for 'weak2foo'}}
+extern void extern2main() { return weak2foo(); } // expected-error {{too few arguments to function call, expected 1, have 0}}
+
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list