[PATCH] D10305: [Clang Static Analyzer] Bug identification

[Phillip Power via cfe-commits]

phillip.power added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305#262534, @xazax.hun wrote:

> - Should we require the generation of old hashes once a change is introduced, or should we expect users who rely on old hash to maintain the old hash generation as an out of tree patch?


I will likely release the analyzer with all the previous hashes generated by default.  I am happy to enable old hashes out of tree, as long as enabling is a small change.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305#262534, @xazax.hun wrote:

> - The hash calculation WILL change in the near future once we figured out how to identify checkers properly (but I think it will not make sense to rename the hash for this change). For this reason I think we should mark this feature as experimental, until that change is introduced. What is the recommended way, to do that? Generating a comment to the plist? Just adding a comment to the headers? Only mention it in the commit log?


How close is "the near future"?  I would like to start using the hashing feature in the next couple of weeks.  If your checker identification improvements are a long time out, I would like you to submit the current hash as non-experimental.

Best regards,
Phillip
SN Systems - Sony Computer Entertainment


http://reviews.llvm.org/D10305