[clang-tools-extra] r248507 - Remove dangling parenthesis.
Angel Garcia Gomez via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 24 08:29:46 PDT 2015
Author: angelgarcia
Date: Thu Sep 24 10:29:46 2015
New Revision: 248507
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=248507&view=rev
Log:
Remove dangling parenthesis.
Summary: Remove parenthesis surrounding the new loop index.
Reviewers: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13133
Modified:
clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp
clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-basic.cpp
clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-extra.cpp
Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp?rev=248507&r1=248506&r2=248507&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp (original)
+++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/clang-tidy/modernize/LoopConvertCheck.cpp Thu Sep 24 10:29:46 2015
@@ -472,11 +472,21 @@ void LoopConvertCheck::doConversion(
// variable.
for (const auto &Usage : Usages) {
std::string ReplaceText;
+ SourceRange Range = Usage.Range;
if (Usage.Expression) {
// If this is an access to a member through the arrow operator, after
// the replacement it must be accessed through the '.' operator.
ReplaceText = Usage.Kind == Usage::UK_MemberThroughArrow ? VarName + "."
: VarName;
+ auto Parents = Context->getParents(*Usage.Expression);
+ if (Parents.size() == 1) {
+ if (const auto *Paren = Parents[0].get<ParenExpr>()) {
+ // Usage.Expression will be replaced with the new index variable,
+ // and parenthesis around a simple DeclRefExpr can always be
+ // removed.
+ Range = Paren->getSourceRange();
+ }
+ }
} else {
// The Usage expression is only null in case of lambda captures (which
// are VarDecl). If the index is captured by value, add '&' to capture
@@ -486,7 +496,7 @@ void LoopConvertCheck::doConversion(
}
TUInfo->getReplacedVars().insert(std::make_pair(Loop, IndexVar));
Diag << FixItHint::CreateReplacement(
- CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(Usage.Range), ReplaceText);
+ CharSourceRange::getTokenRange(Range), ReplaceText);
}
}
Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-basic.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-basic.cpp?rev=248507&r1=248506&r2=248507&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-basic.cpp (original)
+++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-basic.cpp Thu Sep 24 10:29:46 2015
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (elem).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", elem.x);
S *ps;
for (S::iterator it = ps->begin(), e = ps->end(); it != e; ++it) {
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & p : *ps)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (p).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", p.x);
for (S::iterator it = s.begin(), e = s.end(); it != e; ++it) {
printf("s has value %d\n", it->x);
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: (elem).x = 3;
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: elem.x = 3;
for (S::iterator it = s.begin(), e = s.end(); it != e; ++it) {
it->nonConstFun(4, 5);
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : u)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (elem).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", elem.x);
U::iterator A;
for (U::iterator i = u.begin(), e = u.end(); i != e; ++i)
@@ -321,6 +321,21 @@ void f() {
(void) *I;
}
}
+
+ dependent<Val *> dpp;
+ for (dependent<Val *>::iterator I = dpp.begin(), E = dpp.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ printf("%d\n", (**I).x);
+ }
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
+ // CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : dpp)
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("%d\n", (*elem).x);
+
+ for (dependent<Val *>::iterator I = dpp.begin(), E = dpp.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+ printf("%d\n", (*I)->x);
+ }
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
+ // CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : dpp)
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("%d\n", elem->x);
}
// Tests to verify the proper use of auto where the init variable type and the
@@ -334,7 +349,7 @@ void different_type() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto elem : s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (elem).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", elem.x);
S *ps;
for (S::const_iterator it = ps->begin(), e = ps->end(); it != e; ++it) {
@@ -342,7 +357,7 @@ void different_type() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto p : *ps)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (p).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", p.x);
// v.begin() returns a user-defined type 'iterator' which, since it's
// different from const_iterator, disqualifies these loops from
Modified: clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-extra.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-extra.cpp?rev=248507&r1=248506&r2=248507&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-extra.cpp (original)
+++ clang-tools-extra/trunk/test/clang-tidy/modernize-loop-convert-extra.cpp Thu Sep 24 10:29:46 2015
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ void macroConflict() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & MAXs_it : MAXs)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (MAXs_it).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", MAXs_it.x);
// CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("Max of 3 and 5: %d\n", MAX(3, 5));
for (S::const_iterator it = MAXs.begin(), e = MAXs.end(); it != e; ++it) {
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ void macroConflict() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto MAXs_it : MAXs)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (MAXs_it).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", MAXs_it.x);
// CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("Max of 3 and 5: %d\n", MAX(3, 5));
T DEFs;
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ void keywordConflict() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-4]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & __FUNCTION__s_elem : __FUNCTION__s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: int __FUNCTION__s_it = (__FUNCTION__s_elem).x + 2;
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: int __FUNCTION__s_it = __FUNCTION__s_elem.x + 2;
}
void typeConflict() {
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-5]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : NestT)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: for (T::iterator TI = (elem).begin(), TE = (elem).end(); TI != TE; ++TI)
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: for (T::iterator TI = elem.begin(), TE = elem.end(); TI != TE; ++TI)
// CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("%d", *TI);
// The inner loop is also convertible.
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-5]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto elem : NestS)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: for (S::const_iterator SI = (elem).begin(), SE = (elem).end(); SI != SE; ++SI)
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: for (S::const_iterator SI = elem.begin(), SE = elem.end(); SI != SE; ++SI)
// CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("%d", *SI);
for (Nested<S>::const_iterator I = NestS.begin(), E = NestS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (elem).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", elem.x);
S *ps;
for (S::iterator it = ps->begin(); it != ps->end(); ++it) {
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & p : *ps)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (p).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", p.x);
for (S::iterator it = s.begin(); it != s.end(); ++it) {
printf("s has value %d\n", it->x);
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: (elem).x = 3;
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: elem.x = 3;
for (S::iterator it = s.begin(); it != s.end(); ++it) {
it->nonConstFun(4, 5);
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ void f() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto & elem : u)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (elem).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", elem.x);
U::iterator A;
for (U::iterator i = u.begin(); i != u.end(); ++i)
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ void different_type() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto elem : s)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (elem).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", elem.x);
S *ps;
for (S::const_iterator it = ps->begin(); it != ps->end(); ++it) {
@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ void different_type() {
}
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-3]]:3: warning: use range-based for loop instead
// CHECK-FIXES: for (auto p : *ps)
- // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", (p).x);
+ // CHECK-FIXES-NEXT: printf("s has value %d\n", p.x);
// v.begin() returns a user-defined type 'iterator' which, since it's
// different from const_iterator, disqualifies these loops from
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list