r247895 - Fix a typo.

Adrian Prantl via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 17 08:58:54 PDT 2015


Author: adrian
Date: Thu Sep 17 10:58:54 2015
New Revision: 247895

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=247895&view=rev
Log:
Fix a typo.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst

Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst?rev=247895&r1=247894&r2=247895&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/docs/Modules.rst Thu Sep 17 10:58:54 2015
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ Modules are modeled as if each submodule
 
   This behavior is currently only approximated when building a module with submodules. Entities within a submodule that has already been built are visible when building later submodules in that module. This can lead to fragile modules that depend on the build order used for the submodules of the module, and should not be relied upon. This behavior is subject to change.
 
-As an example, in C, this implies that if two structs are defined in different submodules with the same name, those two types are distinct types (but may be *compatible* types if their definitions match. In C++, two structs defined with the same name in different submodules are the *same* type, and must be equivalent under C++'s One Definition Rule.
+As an example, in C, this implies that if two structs are defined in different submodules with the same name, those two types are distinct types (but may be *compatible* types if their definitions match). In C++, two structs defined with the same name in different submodules are the *same* type, and must be equivalent under C++'s One Definition Rule.
 
 .. note::
 




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list