[PATCH] D11797: [LIbClang] Report the named type for ElaboratedType

Sergey Kalinichev via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 10 11:03:20 PDT 2015


skalinichev added a comment.

AFAIUI the canonical type could never be an elaborated type, but just type could.

And yes before we used nested name specifier from the type name as written in the source code (a.k.a. ElaboratedType), now we use nested name specifier of the type that the elaborated type refers to.


http://reviews.llvm.org/D11797





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list