[PATCH] D11797: [LIbClang] Report the named type for ElaboratedType
Sergey Kalinichev via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Sep 10 11:03:20 PDT 2015
skalinichev added a comment.
AFAIUI the canonical type could never be an elaborated type, but just type could.
And yes before we used nested name specifier from the type name as written in the source code (a.k.a. ElaboratedType), now we use nested name specifier of the type that the elaborated type refers to.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11797
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list