[PATCH] D10536: [X86, inlineasm] Implement v, k, Y2, Yk, Yz constraints, improve analysis for x, Y*, L, e, Z, s

[Sean Silva]

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:19 PM, James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> What documentation updates do you mean?
>>>
>>
>> Additions/modifications to:
>> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#inline-assembler-expressions
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__llvm.org_docs_LangRef.html-23inline-2Dassembler-2Dexpressions&d=AwMFaQ&c=8hUWFZcy2Z-Za5rBPlktOQ&r=BSqEv9KvKMW_Ob8SyngJ70KdZISM_ASROnREeq0cCxk&m=u3CcqjIoERsKpg0HB4Ds_N01tFBBS1kr4WNYmjXPUvk&s=flz5OqWJ4huQR1l9sE-2f2WvTSOfXZGErmrwEH9PT5E&e=>
>>
>
> That is only documenting LLVM's support for constraints, and this is only
> modifying clang's support.
>

Yeah, I guess I assumed that this would be going in with accompanying
changes to the LLVM ones, so wanted to get it on the radar.

-- Sean Silva


>
> There are (still) no docs on what constraints clang supports (it's often
> the same as LLVM's support, but not always. It's really quite unfortunate
> how much of the information about what the constraints mean is duplicated
> in clang; it'd be nice to clean that up at some point...)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150720/63b199f8/attachment.html>