r241019 - PR23942: a pure-specifier's integer literal must be spelled '0'

Richard Smith richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Mon Jun 29 16:19:24 PDT 2015


Author: rsmith
Date: Mon Jun 29 18:19:23 2015
New Revision: 241019

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=241019&view=rev
Log:
PR23942: a pure-specifier's integer literal must be spelled '0'

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-class.cpp

Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp?rev=241019&r1=241018&r2=241019&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp Mon Jun 29 18:19:23 2015
@@ -8783,6 +8783,19 @@ namespace {
   }
 }
 
+/// Determine whether the given expression was formed from the token '0'. This
+/// test is necessary to determine whether an initializer is really a
+/// pure-specifier.
+static bool isZeroToken(Sema &S, Expr *E) {
+  auto *IL = dyn_cast<IntegerLiteral>(E);
+  if (!IL || !!IL->getValue() ||
+      !IL->getType()->isSpecificBuiltinType(BuiltinType::Int))
+    return false;
+
+  SmallString<8> Buffer;
+  return S.PP.getSpelling(E->getLocStart(), Buffer) == "0";
+}
+
 /// AddInitializerToDecl - Adds the initializer Init to the
 /// declaration dcl. If DirectInit is true, this is C++ direct
 /// initialization rather than copy initialization.
@@ -8799,9 +8812,11 @@ void Sema::AddInitializerToDecl(Decl *Re
     // With declarators parsed the way they are, the parser cannot
     // distinguish between a normal initializer and a pure-specifier.
     // Thus this grotesque test.
-    IntegerLiteral *IL;
-    if ((IL = dyn_cast<IntegerLiteral>(Init)) && IL->getValue() == 0 &&
-        Context.getCanonicalType(IL->getType()) == Context.IntTy)
+    //
+    // FIXME: The parser should instead treat anything that looks like a
+    // pure-specifier as a pure-specifier, and Sema should convert it to an
+    // initializer when necessary, rather than doing things this way around.
+    if (!DirectInit && isZeroToken(*this, Init))
       CheckPureMethod(Method, Init->getSourceRange());
     else {
       Diag(Method->getLocation(), diag::err_member_function_initialization)

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-class.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-class.cpp?rev=241019&r1=241018&r2=241019&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-class.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/Parser/cxx-class.cpp Mon Jun 29 18:19:23 2015
@@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ public:
   ; // expected-warning{{extra ';' inside a class}}
 
   virtual int vf() const volatile = 0;
+
+  virtual int vf0() = 0l; // expected-error {{does not look like a pure-specifier}}
+  virtual int vf1() = 1; // expected-error {{does not look like a pure-specifier}}
+  virtual int vf2() = 00; // expected-error {{does not look like a pure-specifier}}
+  virtual int vf3() = 0x0; // expected-error {{does not look like a pure-specifier}}
+  virtual int vf4() = 0.0; // expected-error {{does not look like a pure-specifier}}
+  virtual int vf5(){0}; // expected-error +{{}} expected-warning {{unused}}
+  virtual int vf5a(){0;}; // function definition, expected-warning {{unused}}
+  virtual int vf6()(0); // expected-error +{{}} expected-note +{{}}
+  virtual int vf7() = { 0 }; // expected-error {{does not look like a pure-specifier}}
   
 private:
   int x,f(),y,g();





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list