[PATCH] Fix dependency file escaping

[Paul Robinson]

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D9208#169446, @thakis wrote:

> Does gcc intend to fix this soon? Isn't being compatible with gcc important
>  than the other things?


If gcc emitted an incorrect relocation, would you argue that it's important to be compatible with gcc?  Even if you could not point to any linker that handled that buggy relocation in a reasonable way?


http://reviews.llvm.org/D9208

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/