bug 22836 : atomics in shared_ptr (ThreadSanitizer)
Oleg Smolsky
oleg at smolsky.net
Wed Mar 11 08:38:01 PDT 2015
On 2015-03-10 15:31, Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Oleg Smolsky <oleg at smolsky.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi there, I reported a TSan issue that resulted in the following bug report against libc++:
>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22836
>>
>> Could you folks take a look at the following (intuitive) patch please?
>> http://reviews.llvm.org/D8147
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Oleg.
> Can the increment be relaxed?
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/q/28199212/576911
>
>
Hi Howard, my understanding is that the increment path can become:
__shared_owners_.fetch_add(1, std::memory_order_acquire);
BTW, does that make any difference on x86-64?
Oleg.
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list