[PATCH] [Analyzer] Individual options for checkers #2

[Anna Zaks]

> Regarding the options validation on the frontend:

> Indeed, it would be nicer to use a clang method to check if a string is an identifier however I did not found a >nice way to do that. The only way I came up with was to create a raw lexer and lex the option string. If you >consider that better than using a RegEx I will alter the patch accordingly.


It would also be good to check that the names of the checkers and packages are identifiers and that the option is a fully qualified checker name followed by the option name... Let's create a separate patch for validation and check if it can be done more elegantly.

The rest of the patch LGTM and can land. Thank you for working on this!


http://reviews.llvm.org/D7905

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/