[PATCH] Support __attribute__((availability)) on Android.
Aaron Ballman
aaron at aaronballman.com
Tue Mar 3 10:49:18 PST 2015
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote:
> That's a good question. You'd have to ask someone from Apple :)
>
> Those test cases were just copied from attr-availability-macosx.c. I figured
> it was better to leave them in case they were testing something generic
> rather than some specific Apple related bug.
I would pull them as they don't appear to be testing anything that
isn't already covered elsewhere.
~Aaron
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:41 PM, Dan Albert <danalbert at google.com> wrote:
>> > Hi srhines,
>> >
>> > REPOSITORY
>> > rL LLVM
>> >
>> > http://reviews.llvm.org/D7929
>> >
>> > Files:
>> > include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
>> > lib/Basic/Targets.cpp
>> > test/Sema/attr-availability-android.c
>> >
>> > Index: include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
>> > +++ include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
>> > @@ -440,6 +440,7 @@
>> > let AdditionalMembers =
>> > [{static llvm::StringRef getPrettyPlatformName(llvm::StringRef
>> > Platform) {
>> > return llvm::StringSwitch<llvm::StringRef>(Platform)
>> > + .Case("android", "Android")
>> > .Case("ios", "iOS")
>> > .Case("macosx", "OS X")
>> > .Default(llvm::StringRef());
>> > Index: lib/Basic/Targets.cpp
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- lib/Basic/Targets.cpp
>> > +++ lib/Basic/Targets.cpp
>> > @@ -364,8 +364,13 @@
>> > DefineStd(Builder, "linux", Opts);
>> > Builder.defineMacro("__gnu_linux__");
>> > Builder.defineMacro("__ELF__");
>> > - if (Triple.getEnvironment() == llvm::Triple::Android)
>> > + if (Triple.getEnvironment() == llvm::Triple::Android) {
>> > Builder.defineMacro("__ANDROID__", "1");
>> > + unsigned Maj, Min, Rev;
>> > + Triple.getOSVersion(Maj, Min, Rev);
>> > + this->PlatformName = "android";
>> > + this->PlatformMinVersion = VersionTuple(Maj, Min, Rev);
>> > + }
>> > if (Opts.POSIXThreads)
>> > Builder.defineMacro("_REENTRANT");
>> > if (Opts.CPlusPlus)
>> > Index: test/Sema/attr-availability-android.c
>> > ===================================================================
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ test/Sema/attr-availability-android.c
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> > +// RUN: %clang_cc1 "-triple" "arm-linux-androideabi16" -fsyntax-only
>> > -verify %s
>> > +
>> > +void f0(int)
>> > __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=14,deprecated=19)));
>> > +void f1(int) __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=16)));
>> > +void f2(int)
>> > __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=14,deprecated=16))); //
>> > expected-note {{'f2' has been explicitly marked deprecated here}}
>> > +void f3(int) __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=19)));
>> > +void f4(int)
>> > __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=9,deprecated=11,obsoleted=16),
>> > availability(ios,introduced=2.0,deprecated=3.0))); //
>> > expected-note{{explicitly marked unavailable}}
>> > +void f5(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,introduced=3.2),
>> > availability(android,unavailable))); // expected-note{{'f5' has been
>> > explicitly marked unavailable here}}
>> > +
>> > +void test() {
>> > + f0(0);
>> > + f1(0);
>> > + f2(0); // expected-warning{{'f2' is deprecated: first deprecated in
>> > Android 16}}
>> > + f3(0);
>> > + f4(0); // expected-error{{f4' is unavailable: obsoleted in Android
>> > 16}}
>> > + f5(0); // expected-error{{'f5' is unavailable: not available on
>> > Android}}
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +// rdar://10535640
>> > +
>> > +enum {
>> > + foo
>> > __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0)))
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +enum {
>> > + bar
>> > __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0))) = foo
>> > +};
>> > +
>> > +enum
>> > __attribute__((availability(android,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0))) {
>> > + bar1 = foo
>> > +};
>>
>> What are the enum tests supposed to be testing? The rdar link isn't
>> helpful for most folks.
>>
>> Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks!
>>
>> ~Aaron
>>
>> >
>> > EMAIL PREFERENCES
>> > http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cfe-commits mailing list
>> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list