[PATCH] clang-format: [js] Support type annotations
Daniel Jasper
djasper at google.com
Wed Feb 18 08:23:49 PST 2015
I'd use ternary expressions, what do you think? Otherwise looks good, I can submit this for you.
================
Comment at: lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:424-428
@@ -426,3 +423,7 @@
} else if (Contexts.back().ColonIsForRangeExpr) {
- Tok->Type = TT_RangeBasedForLoopColon;
+ if (Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_JavaScript) {
+ Tok->Type = TT_JsTypeColon;
+ } else {
+ Tok->Type = TT_RangeBasedForLoopColon;
+ }
} else if (CurrentToken && CurrentToken->is(tok::numeric_constant)) {
----------------
Maybe
Tok->Type = Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_JavaScript
? TT_JsTypeColon
: TT_RangeBasedForLoopColon;
?
================
Comment at: lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:435-438
@@ -433,1 +434,6 @@
+ Tok->Type = TT_JsTypeColon;
+ else if (Tok->Previous->is(tok::r_paren))
+ Tok->Type = TT_CtorInitializerColon;
+ else
+ Tok->Type = TT_InheritanceColon;
} else if (Tok->Previous->is(tok::identifier) && Tok->Next &&
----------------
Here, too?
================
Comment at: lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp:445-448
@@ -438,2 +444,6 @@
} else if (Contexts.back().ContextKind == tok::l_paren) {
- Tok->Type = TT_InlineASMColon;
+ if (Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_JavaScript) {
+ Tok->Type = TT_JsTypeColon;
+ } else {
+ Tok->Type = TT_InlineASMColon;
+ }
----------------
Here, too?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7721
EMAIL PREFERENCES
http://reviews.llvm.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list