[PATCH] libclang: functions to deal with anonymous fields

Loïc Jaquemet loic.jaquemet at gmail.com
Fri Jan 30 18:13:34 PST 2015


+ Removed the useless default that creates a warning.
+ cleaned some whitespaces

Testing Time: 127.86s
  Expected Passes    : 20169
  Expected Failures  : 103
  Unsupported Tests  : 88

2015-01-29 19:08 GMT-07:00 Loïc Jaquemet <loic.jaquemet at gmail.com>:
> my bad,
>
> I was using make check instead of make check-all
>
> the TU is fixed in the patch attached (2 modifs in print-type.cpp )
>
> $ ./Release+Asserts/bin/llvm-lit ~/llvm/tools/clang/test/Index/
> [..]
> Testing Time: 5.49s
>   Expected Passes    : 239
> $
>
>
> $ make check-all
> llvm[0]: Running test suite
> [..]
> Testing Time: 127.90s
>   Expected Passes    : 20158
>   Expected Failures  : 101
>   Unsupported Tests  : 88
>
>
>
> 2015-01-29 18:22 GMT-07:00 Loïc Jaquemet <loic.jaquemet at gmail.com>:
>> Apparently it was reverted in r227472
>>
>> 2015-01-29 5:49 GMT-07:00 Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com>:
>>> I committed in r227432, thanks.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <kyrtzidis at apple.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I think it’s good to go, thanks Loïc!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, since your patch is just a rebasing of something that was already
>>>> reviewed, I think you can go ahead and commit..
>>>> any objection?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Loïc Jaquemet <loic.jaquemet at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> would it be possible to get a review for this patch (libclang/python
>>>>> bindings) ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-01-21 19:00 GMT-07:00 Loïc Jaquemet <loic.jaquemet at gmail.com>:
>>>>> > Please find this patches updated for .226743.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * libclang: Add three functions useful for dealing with anonymous
>>>>> > fields.
>>>>> > +clang_Cursor_getOffsetOfField
>>>>> > +clang_Cursor_isAnonymous
>>>>> > +clang_Type_visitFields
>>>>> > Fixed: reuse CXVisitorResult instead of introducing a new enum
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * Python; Add corresponding methods for dealing with anonymous fields.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * TU in print-type
>>>>> > adds [nbFields] in c-index-test for records
>>>>> > for anonymous record, shows offset of field in anonymous and parent
>>>>> > record. ( clang_Type_getOffsetOf/clang_Cursor_getOffsetOfField)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > LLVM tests passes
>>>>> > python tests passees
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > * Reference from 2013/2014
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140217/099453.html
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2015-01-21 12:28 GMT-07:00 Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com>:
>>>>> >> Hi Loic,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Seems like this was never committed in trunk?  Any reason why?
>>>>> >> I have a project with a  lot of anonymous struct and this patch would
>>>>> >> be
>>>>> >> useful.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis
>>>>> >> <kyrtzidis at apple.com>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> On Feb 16, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Loïc Jaquemet <loic.jaquemet at gmail.com>
>>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> +/**
>>>>> >>> >> + * \brief Visitor invoked for each field found by a traversal.
>>>>> >>> >> + *
>>>>> >>> >> + * This visitor function will be invoked for each field found by
>>>>> >>> >> + * clang_visitCursorFields(). Its first argument is the cursor
>>>>> >>> >> being
>>>>> >>> >> + * visited, its second argument is the client data provided to
>>>>> >>> >> + * clang_visitCursorFields().
>>>>> >>> >> + *
>>>>> >>> >> + * The visitor should return one of the \c CXFieldVisitResult
>>>>> >>> >> values
>>>>> >>> >> + * to direct clang_visitCursorFields().
>>>>> >>> >> + */
>>>>> >>> >> +typedef enum CXFieldVisitResult (*CXFieldVisitor)(CXCursor C,
>>>>> >>> >> +                                                  CXClientData
>>>>> >>> >> client_data);
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> +CINDEX_LINKAGE unsigned clang_Type_visitFields(CXType T,
>>>>> >>> >> +                                               CXFieldVisitor
>>>>> >>> >> visitor,
>>>>> >>> >> +                                               CXClientData
>>>>> >>> >> client_data);
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> In general, the visitor is not recursing, right ? In that case why
>>>>> >>> >> not
>>>>> >>> >> use a simpler "getNumFields / getField" pair of functions ?
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > Well, the source code (AST.Decl.h ) exposes a iterator on its
>>>>> >>> > fields.
>>>>> >>> > Given that in other similar cases a visitor is used, I did the
>>>>> >>> > same.
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > I did not want to introduce new code/new logic.
>>>>> >>> > I just want to expose the iterator.
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > Do you want me to change it to a "getNumFields / getField" pair of
>>>>> >>> > functions ?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I see, the visitor interface is fine.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >> +enum CXFieldVisitResult {
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> Could you reuse CXVisitorResult instead of introducing a new enum
>>>>> >>> >> ?
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > Yes. I did not see that one.
>>>>> >>> > Will change that.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> After that, LGTM!
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >> On Feb 10, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Loïc Jaquemet
>>>>> >>> >> <loic.jaquemet at gmail.com>
>>>>> >>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >>> Hi,
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> I'm pinging back about this patch :
>>>>> >>> >>> * libclang: Add three functions useful for dealing with anonymous
>>>>> >>> >>> fields.
>>>>> >>> >>> +clang_Cursor_getOffsetOfField
>>>>> >>> >>> +clang_Cursor_isAnonymous
>>>>> >>> >>> +clang_Type_visitFields
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Currently, there is no function in libclang to access clang logic
>>>>> >>> >>> that
>>>>> >>> >>> handles anonymous members in a record.
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Given the current API , there is no direct method to :
>>>>> >>> >>> a) recover the offset of an anonymous field.
>>>>> >>> >>> - displayname == spelling == '', clang_Type_getOffset does not
>>>>> >>> >>> work
>>>>> >>> >>> + new clang_Cursor_getOffsetOfField will expose that information
>>>>> >>> >>> b) clearly identify that DECL as an anonymous record.
>>>>> >>> >>> + new clang_Cursor_isAnonymous will expose that information
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> When using clang_visitChildren, an anonymous member will be
>>>>> >>> >>> returned
>>>>> >>> >>> as a STRUCT_DECL/UNION_DECL.
>>>>> >>> >>> Currently the libclang user has to re-implement the logic to
>>>>> >>> >>> differentiate FIELD_DECL in the list of children nodes
>>>>> >>> >>> For example,
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> struct A {
>>>>> >>> >>> struct {int a;} typeanon;
>>>>> >>> >>> struct {
>>>>> >>> >>>   int bariton;
>>>>> >>> >>>   union {
>>>>> >>> >>>     int foo;
>>>>> >>> >>>     int foo2;
>>>>> >>> >>>   };
>>>>> >>> >>> };
>>>>> >>> >>> int c;
>>>>> >>> >>> } ;
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Some children are STRUCT_DECL, some are FIELD_DECL, some are
>>>>> >>> >>> attributes.
>>>>> >>> >>> Worse,
>>>>> >>> >>> children[0] == STRUCT_DECL (struct {int a;})
>>>>> >>> >>> children[1] == FIELD_DECL (typeanon)
>>>>> >>> >>> children[2] == STRUCT_DECL (anonymous structure)
>>>>> >>> >>> children[3] == FIELD_DECL (int c)
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> Sometime a STRUCT_DECL is a field (children[2]) sometimes it is
>>>>> >>> >>> just a
>>>>> >>> >>> STRUCT_DECL.
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> The  new function clang_Type_visitFields will expose the existing
>>>>> >>> >>> libclang capabilities to list only fields, and not all children
>>>>> >>> >>> node,
>>>>> >>> >>> as does clang_visitChildren.
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> fields[0] == FIELD_DECL (first structure - typeanon)
>>>>> >>> >>> fields[1] == FIELD_DECL (second anonymous structure)
>>>>> >>> >>> fields[2] == FIELD_DECL (int c)
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>>
>>>>> >>> >>> --
>>>>> >>> >>> Loïc Jaquemet
>>>>> >>> >>> <libclang-visit-fields.201116>
>>>>> >>> >>
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> >
>>>>> >>> > --
>>>>> >>> > Loïc Jaquemet
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>> >>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Loïc Jaquemet
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Loïc Jaquemet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Jaquemet
>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Jaquemet



-- 
Loïc Jaquemet
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 201501-visit-fields.227628
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 19803 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150130/a153005f/attachment.obj>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list