r225244 - Sema: analyze I,J,K,M,N,O constraints
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at google.com
Thu Jan 15 10:41:51 PST 2015
- Previous message: r225244 - Sema: analyze I,J,K,M,N,O constraints
- Next message: r225244 - Sema: analyze I,J,K,M,N,O constraints
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <
joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
> See the inb example. All fixes are pessimations for the code. People
> complained enough about the (in)ability of __builtin_constant_p to get
> it delayed to the backend, this is IMO just the same.
>
I agree it is the same, however I have heard extremely little complaining
about __builtin_constant_p. I've also not heard any complaints other than
yours about this change -- most of the complaints I've heard have been
about the terribly brittle code it uncovered and is now getting fixed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20150115/a0c3a39e/attachment.html>
- Previous message: r225244 - Sema: analyze I,J,K,M,N,O constraints
- Next message: r225244 - Sema: analyze I,J,K,M,N,O constraints
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list