Wrong lookup performed for __super

[Nikola Smiljanic]

Can I commit this Reid?

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ping.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Something like this?
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I see lots of calls to LookupQualifiedName and only a few of them check
>>> if they should call LookupInSuper.
>>>
>>> Many users of LookupQualifiedName are looking up thinks like
>>> SomeClass::operator=, so they don't have a CXXScopeSpec. Maybe we should
>>> add a CXXScopeSpec overload to LookupQualifiedName to make it easier for
>>> callers to do the right thing?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ping
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It seems that there's one more place where we need to call
>>>>> LookupInSuper. I've modified the relevant tests to catch this by having
>>>>> different signature for the method and making sure the right one is called.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20141201/b542d4e1/attachment.html>