Wrong lookup performed for __super
popizdeh at gmail.com
Sun Nov 23 20:14:36 PST 2014
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
> Something like this?
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>> I see lots of calls to LookupQualifiedName and only a few of them check
>> if they should call LookupInSuper.
>> Many users of LookupQualifiedName are looking up thinks like
>> SomeClass::operator=, so they don't have a CXXScopeSpec. Maybe we should
>> add a CXXScopeSpec overload to LookupQualifiedName to make it easier for
>> callers to do the right thing?
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
>>> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Nikola Smiljanic <popizdeh at gmail.com>
>>>> It seems that there's one more place where we need to call
>>>> LookupInSuper. I've modified the relevant tests to catch this by having
>>>> different signature for the method and making sure the right one is called.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cfe-commits