[patch] Make "C++98 requires an accessible copy constructor" warning DefaultIgnore
Richard Smith
richard at metafoo.co.uk
Sat Sep 6 16:40:19 PDT 2014
Oh, and you should also move the existing -Wc++98-compat warning to
-Wc++98-compat-pedantic.
On 6 Sep 2014 16:38, "Richard Smith" <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
> -Wc++98-compat doesn't make sense here: that warning group is for warning
> on code that is valid in the current language but not in C++98.
>
> The right way to make this change would be to downgrade this from ExtWarn
> to Extension.
> On 6 Sep 2014 16:08, "Nico Weber" <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> the attached (tiny) patch changes the ""C++98 requires an accessible copy
>> constructor" warning to be DefaultIgnore, like e.g. "commas at the end of
>> enumerator lists are incompatible with C++98" is. The reasoning is that
>> this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in C++11, so it
>> doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default. Building
>> with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still shows the
>> warning.
>>
>> The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that
>> was emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and
>> detecting clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior
>> than just giving the compiler a good default for this warning.
>>
>> Ok?
>>
>> Nico
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140906/7c660793/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list