r216249 - [test/CodeGen/ARM] Adpat test to match new codegen after r216236.

Quentin Colombet qcolombet at apple.com
Mon Aug 25 10:05:28 PDT 2014


Note: There were already a bunch of tests that do not check anything, e.g., test_vcombine_s8.

> On Aug 25, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Renato,
> 
>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 5:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> On 22 August 2014 01:27, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote:
>>> Author: qcolombet
>>> Date: Thu Aug 21 19:27:52 2014
>>> New Revision: 216249
>>> 
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=216249&view=rev <http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=216249&view=rev>
>>> Log:
>>> [test/CodeGen/ARM] Adpat test to match new codegen after r216236.
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Quentin,
>> 
>> I think removing the tests is not a good idea, since they're not
>> testing optimizations, but the correct lowering of the intrinsics.
>> 
>> The right way of fixing this test is to avoid the optimization to
>> occur, by making the parameters extern variables or the like.
> 
> The problem is that the intrinsics at stake are just fancy moves, that can be coalesced. I do not think there is a way to prevent the optimization to happen other than disabling the optimization.
> I can add the flag to do that, but I guess that wouldn’t be the right fix, since we could have another backend that LLVM.
> If we do want to check the lowering of intrinsics, shouldn’t we drop Os from the run command?
> 
> To get a sense of what is different, here are a few examples,
> _test_vdup_n_u32:
> 	vmov	d16, r0, r0
> 	vmov	r0, r1, d16
> 	bx	lr
> =>
> _test_vdup_n_u32:
> 	mov	r1, r0
> 	bx	lr
> 
> ———
> _test_vcreate_s64:
> 	vmov.32	d16[0], r0
> 	vmov.32	d16[1], r1
> 	vmov	r0, r1, d16
> 	bx	lr
> =>
> _test_vcreate_s64:
> 	bx	lr
> 
> ———
> _test_vget_lane_u32:
> 	vmov	d0, r0, r1
> 	vmov	r0, s1
> 	bx	lr
> =>
> _test_vget_lane_u32:
> 	mov	r0, r1
> 	bx	lr
> 
> Thanks,
> -Quentin
>> 
>> cheers,
>> --renato
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140825/966588b9/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list