[PATCH] Fix PR17239 by changing the semantics of the RemainingArgsClass Option kind (clang side)
Rafael Auler
rafaelauler at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 11:52:04 PDT 2014
Hi Reid,
Sure, thanks for reviewing it. I answered your comment below.
================
Comment at: tools/driver/driver.cpp:406-409
@@ -391,1 +405,6 @@
+ // Remove markers, if we added them
+ if (MarkEOLs) {
+ auto newEnd = std::remove(argv.begin(), argv.end(), nullptr);
+ argv.resize(newEnd - argv.begin());
+ }
return ExecuteCC1Tool(argv, argv[1] + 4);
----------------
Reid Kleckner wrote:
> This seems impossible. If we invoked a cc1 tool, we shouldn't have added EOL markers, right?
I made this check just in case the user puts "-cc1" as a first argument in a response file. In this case, MarkEOLs would be true. After expanding the response files, we would end up here with MarkEOLs true (a contrived example, but possible).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4900
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list