[ARM] Regression between r215896 and r215960

[Renato Golin]

On 20 August 2014 14:23, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> 846 and 845 are both bad, and ever since it first regressed, 20 new
> failures have been creeping in... :(

So, apparently, by going backwards (via bisection) and not cleaning, I
made all good commits fail, so there is some level of caching
involved. Though, I cleaned the bot (even the source), and it still
fails, so it's not *just* caching.

I'm testing clean sequentially now, and each hop takes about 1h20min
to finish, which is really fast for a full bootstrap on ARM hardware.
I'm keeping all the logs and will let you guys know when it spots
something.

cheers,
--renato