[PATCH/RFC] Expose OpenCL Attributes in libclang

Paul Fox fox at emphotonics.com
Mon Aug 11 11:10:50 PDT 2014


Pinging this now that 3.5 is branched.

On 07/21/2014 04:35 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Paul Fox <fox at emphotonics.com 
> <mailto:fox at emphotonics.com>> wrote:
>
>     Rebasing against trunk does not appear to have caused any changes
>     to the patch, but here is the change in a single patch.
>
>     Thanks!
>
>
> Thanks Paul. Please ping this again after the branch is cut and I will 
> commit.
>
> Eli
>
>
>
>     On 07/21/2014 04:18 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Paul Fox <fox at emphotonics.com
>>     <mailto:fox at emphotonics.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         What is the procedure for getting this merged? Is any further
>>         action required on my part? I haven't been able to find
>>         specifics on this process beyond posting patches to this list
>>         for review.
>>
>>
>>     Paul, rebase your patches vs. latest trunk and then I can commit
>>     it for you.
>>
>>     Eli
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On 06/27/2014 12:02 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
>>>         LGTM
>>>
>>>
>>>         On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Paul Fox
>>>         <fox at emphotonics.com <mailto:fox at emphotonics.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Here are initial patches that expose the inheritable
>>>             attributes for OpenCL in libclang, including the python
>>>             bindings.
>>>
>>>             I initially posted these on the dev mailing list, but
>>>             since they received no response, I presume that this
>>>             list is a better place for them.
>>>
>>>             As far as I can tell, since the address space attributes
>>>             are type attributes, exposing them will require adding
>>>             to the libclang API. Along these lines, it might be
>>>             useful to have a generalized way to query type
>>>             attributes so that more semantic analysis can be done
>>>             through libclang. Any thoughts on this?
>>>
>>>             Paul Fox
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             cfe-commits mailing list
>>>             cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
>>>             http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140811/8f207069/attachment.html>


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list