[PATCH] Expose name mangling to libclang

[Eli Bendersky]

>>! In D4663#4, @rengolin wrote:
> Hi Eli,
> 
> Looks ok to me, but I'm not the expert. Would be good to have some negative tests, though.
> 
> cheers,
> --renato

I'm not 100% what you mean as "negative tests" in this context. I did add a check that nodes that shouldn't get mangled, aren't, in this new patch. Also addressed the other review by checking MS mangling as well.

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4663