[PATCH] Proposal on how to fix temporary dtors.
Manuel Klimek
klimek at google.com
Mon Jul 7 10:41:20 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:37 , Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2014, at 10:28 , Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Jordan Rose <jordan_rose at apple.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you add an assertion at the end of a block that there are no
>>> outstanding temporary destructors in the current stack frame? That seems
>>> useful.
>>>
>>
>> Do you mean at the end of a VisitBlockDecl?
>>
>>
>> No, during the path-sensitive run, so handleBlockExit.
>>
>
> So you mean at the end of a CFG block? But here we might have outstanding
> temporary dtors open (?)
>
>
> Oops, right. Was thinking too much in terms of AST structure. How about at
> the end of a function (inlined or not)?
>
Could we say every time we transition from a block with a temp dtor
terminator to a block that does not have a temp dtor terminator (or an
unconditional terminator) we check?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140707/d5b1845c/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list