[PATCH] gcc compatibility: silent -finline-limit=1234 & -finline-limit

[Alp Toker]

Patch?

I investigated this flag too a while back and reached the conclusion 
it's only interesting to support if we actually hook it into the backend.

Otherwise it's unfair to users to silently claim support for an option 
that has semantic significance, only to go and ignore it. Especially if 
it's only to unblock a dozen packages it'd be a shame.

On the plus side, it was really rewarding to implement a GCC-compatible 
-Wframe-larger-than= a few weeks ago so I *do* think there's value in 
providing real implementations of these flags because it informs 
decisions we need to make about backend/frontend layering.

Alp.


On 04/07/2014 18:15, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> adding cfe-commits
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4376
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

-- 
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts