[PATCH] Fix "warning: fallthrough annotation does not directly precede switch label" in lambdas.

[Alexander Kornienko]

================
Comment at: test/SemaCXX/switch-implicit-fallthrough.cpp:285
@@ +284,3 @@
+
+int fallthrough_targets(int n) {
+  [[clang::fallthrough]]; // expected-error{{fallthrough annotation is outside switch statement}}
----------------
Reid Kleckner wrote:
> Why did this code have to move?  Aaron asked about it.
I've already answered on the list.
> Clang seems to stop producing warnings after the function containing errors, so the test with errors should be the last one (or maybe even in a separate file).

http://reviews.llvm.org/D4258