[PATCH] When producing an InlineAsm warning, don't automatically promote it to an error

Alp Toker alp at nuanti.com
Thu Jun 5 12:53:36 PDT 2014


On 05/06/2014 21:59, Joey Gouly wrote:
> Pretty much as the title says. Just make sure we pick the right diagnostic according to the diagnostic produced by the backend.

Cool.

>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D4036
>
> Files:
>    lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
>    test/CodeGen/arm-asm-deprecated.c
>
> Index: lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
> ===================================================================
> --- lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
> +++ lib/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.cpp
> @@ -297,13 +297,24 @@
>     FullSourceLoc Loc;
>     if (D.getLoc() != SMLoc())
>       Loc = ConvertBackendLocation(D, Context->getSourceManager());
> -
>   
> +  unsigned DiagID;
> +  switch (D.getKind()) {
> +  case llvm::SourceMgr::DK_Error:
> +    DiagID = diag::err_fe_inline_asm;
> +    break;
> +  case llvm::SourceMgr::DK_Warning:
> +    DiagID = diag::warn_fe_inline_asm;
> +    break;
> +  case llvm::SourceMgr::DK_Note:
> +    DiagID = diag::note_fe_inline_asm;
> +    break;
> +  }

It's a shame we can't use the crummy ComputeDiagID() macro. Hopefully 
this will all become consistent at some point.

>     // If this problem has clang-level source location information, report the
>     // issue as being an error in the source with a note showing the instantiated
>     // code.

s/ as being an error//

>     if (LocCookie.isValid()) {
> -    Diags.Report(LocCookie, diag::err_fe_inline_asm).AddString(Message);
> +    Diags.Report(LocCookie, DiagID).AddString(Message);
>       
>       if (D.getLoc().isValid()) {
>         DiagnosticBuilder B = Diags.Report(Loc, diag::note_fe_inline_asm_here);
> @@ -322,7 +333,7 @@
>     // Otherwise, report the backend error as occurring in the generated .s file.
>     // If Loc is invalid, we still need to report the error, it just gets no
>     // location info.

s/error/issue/g

> -  Diags.Report(Loc, diag::err_fe_inline_asm).AddString(Message);
> +  Diags.Report(Loc, DiagID).AddString(Message);
>   }
>   
>   #define ComputeDiagID(Severity, GroupName, DiagID)                             \
> Index: test/CodeGen/arm-asm-deprecated.c
> ===================================================================
> --- test/CodeGen/arm-asm-deprecated.c
> +++ test/CodeGen/arm-asm-deprecated.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +// REQUIRES: arm-registered-target
> +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple armv8 -target-feature +neon %s -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-v8
> +// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -triple armv8 -target-feature +neon %s -S -o /dev/null -Werror 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-v8-Werror
> +
> +void set_endian() {
> +  asm("setend be"); // CHECK-v8: warning: deprecated
> +                    // CHECK-v8-Werror: error: deprecated
> +}

Can you provide an x86 test instead/as well? Frontend folk tend to 
enable only the native workstation backend and would appreciate having 
some coverage.

Alp.


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

-- 
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts




More information about the cfe-commits mailing list