[PATCH] Proposal on how to fix temporary dtors.

[Manuel Klimek]

This time it's hopefully more understandable and correct - I also added a
regression test that would fail with my previous non-solution.

And keep the test cases coming ;) I think we can use some more...

Cheers,
/Manuel



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:

> Another try at solving the temporary destructor CFG.
>
> http://reviews.llvm.org/D3627
>
> Files:
>   include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CoreEngine.h
>   include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/ExprEngine.h
>   include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SubEngine.h
>   lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp
>   lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CoreEngine.cpp
>   lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngine.cpp
>   lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/ExprEngineCXX.cpp
>   test/Analysis/temp-obj-dtors-cfg-output.cpp
>   test/Analysis/temporaries.cpp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140528/ff5ec613/attachment.html>