[OPENMP] cbergstrom as OMP patch reviewer RFC

["C. Bergström"]

On 05/23/14 11:55 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> Unrelated to this specific patch, however:
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:17 AM, "C. Bergström" 
> <cbergstrom at pathscale.com <mailto:cbergstrom at pathscale.com>> wrote:
>
>     LGTM - maybe give it 1-2 more days for others to have a chance to
>     review and if no objections push - Thanks
>
>
> Please don't mark patches as looking good and encouraging the 
> contributors to commit for areas of the code and/or project you have 
> no familiarity with. I understand that you're quite familiar with 
> OpenMP, but as you aren't a regular Clang contributor (very few 
> patches submitted, none I could find committed directly) and aren't 
> one of the maintainers or code owners of Sema, it seems better to 
> leave the final review to others.
I'm changing the subject to avoid hijacking the original thread
----------
Chandler has raised concerns I'm unqualified to review any of the OpenMP 
work being submitted by Intel. I respect his opinion, but at the same 
time I'd like to continue reviewing these patches where I have the time. 
I obviously can't do this unless others feel I am qualified though.

To further clarify - in some cases I'm acting as a proxy to other 
engineers on our team. (Most of these engineers have many years of 
experience working with clang). I realize bandwidth for the clang 
developers to review OMP is limited - my goal is to help provide a 2nd 
set of eyes on low risk contributions in order to help get great OMP 
support in clang. You'll see based on history I don't review random things.

2nd - in the event my review isn't perfect and there's some intricate 
detail I missed - in general the Intel team is extremely responsive and 
a minor follow-up commit would likely fix any nit. (With the downside of 
some commit noise, but in general I don't think every llvm/clang commit 
is perfect out of the box - I can't speak for the community, but it 
seems reasonable to me)

If anyone wants to +1 me as a reviewer for the OMP work please speak up. 
(Otherwise I won't be able to provide further help in this area)

Thanks