[PATCH 2/3] Implicit address space conversion on POD assign

[Ronan KERYELL]

>>>>> On Sun, 18 May 2014 20:00:09 -0700, Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> said:

    Alp> Do we want an extension diagnostic here? As David Chisnall
    Alp> pointed out
    >> there are other possible interpretations even if this happens to
    >> be the one we already use in C mode.

    Richard> Do we have some underlying standard of which this is an
    Richard> extension?

To have a C++ extension to OpenCL? At least there is the provisional
specification of http://www.khronos.org/opencl/sycl/

This is something I am starting to play with, but nothing with Clang
yet: https://github.com/amd/triSYCL

So yes, go ahead to allow OpenCL in a C++ mode directly in the mainstream Clang. :-)
-- 
  Ronan KERYELL