[PATCH] ARM: PCS non-compliance when struct is padded to avoid register/stack split, and requires internal padding
Oliver Stannard
oliver.stannard at arm.com
Fri May 9 09:08:27 PDT 2014
When we were padding a struct to avoid splitting it between registers and the stack, we were throwing away the type which the argument should be coerced to. This patch fixes this.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3705
Files:
lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp
test/CodeGen/arm-aapcs-vfp.c
Index: lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp
+++ lib/CodeGen/TargetInfo.cpp
@@ -3909,16 +3909,20 @@
// If we have allocated some arguments onto the stack (due to running
// out of VFP registers), we cannot split an argument between GPRs and
// the stack. If this situation occurs, we add padding to prevent the
- // GPRs from being used. In this situiation, the current argument could
+ // GPRs from being used. In this situation, the current argument could
// only be allocated by rule C.8, so rule C.6 would mark these GPRs as
// unusable anyway.
const bool StackUsed = PreAllocationGPRs > NumGPRs || PreAllocationVFPs > NumVFPs;
if (!IsCPRC && PreAllocationGPRs < NumGPRs && AllocatedGPRs > NumGPRs && StackUsed) {
llvm::Type *PaddingTy = llvm::ArrayType::get(
llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(getVMContext()), NumGPRs - PreAllocationGPRs);
- I.info = ABIArgInfo::getDirect(nullptr /* type */, 0 /* offset */,
- PaddingTy);
-
+ if (I.info.canHaveCoerceToType()) {
+ I.info = ABIArgInfo::getDirect(I.info.getCoerceToType() /* type */, 0 /* offset */,
+ PaddingTy);
+ } else {
+ I.info = ABIArgInfo::getDirect(nullptr /* type */, 0 /* offset */,
+ PaddingTy);
+ }
}
}
Index: test/CodeGen/arm-aapcs-vfp.c
===================================================================
--- test/CodeGen/arm-aapcs-vfp.c
+++ test/CodeGen/arm-aapcs-vfp.c
@@ -125,12 +125,17 @@
// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_1(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, i32 %j, i64 %k, i32 %l)
void test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_1(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e, double f, double g, double h, double i, int j, long long k, int l) {}
-// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_2(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, i32 %j, [3 x i32], %struct.struct_long_long_int %k.coerce)
+// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_2(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, i32 %j, [3 x i32], [2 x i64] %k.coerce)
void test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_2(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e, double f, double g, double h, double i, int j, struct_long_long_int k) {}
-// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_3(%struct.struct_long_long_int* noalias sret %agg.result, double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, [3 x i32], %struct.struct_long_long_int %k.coerce)
+// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_3(%struct.struct_long_long_int* noalias sret %agg.result, double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, [3 x i32], [2 x i64] %k.coerce)
struct_long_long_int test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_3(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e, double f, double g, double h, double i, struct_long_long_int k) {}
typedef struct { int a; int b:4; int c; } struct_int_bitfield_int;
-// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_bitfield(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, i32 %j, i32 %k, [2 x i32], %struct.struct_int_bitfield_int %l.coerce)
+// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_bitfield(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, i32 %j, i32 %k, [2 x i32], [3 x i32] %l.coerce)
void test_test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_bitfield(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e, double f, double g, double h, double i, int j, int k, struct_int_bitfield_int l) {}
+
+// Note: this struct requires internal padding
+typedef struct { int x; long long y; } struct_int_long_long;
+// CHECK: define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_4(double %a, double %b, double %c, double %d, double %e, double %f, double %g, double %h, double %i, i32 %j, [3 x i32], [2 x i64] %k.coerce)
+void test_vfp_stack_gpr_split_4(double a, double b, double c, double d, double e, double f, double g, double h, double i, int j, struct_int_long_long k) {}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D3705.9265.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140509/d1c6ba51/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list