[PATCH] Jump scope checker recovery
Alp Toker
alp at nuanti.com
Fri May 9 01:55:19 PDT 2014
On 06/05/2014 01:14, Richard Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com
> <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 05/05/2014 22:47, Richard Smith wrote:
>
> Seems like a good idea to me. Are there any cases where we
> should be suppressing diagnostics when the function is
> invalid? (This would be the case if adding more statements
> could cause us to suppress a diagnostic.) I can't think of any
> likely ones -- discarding an invalid GNU label declaration
> might have this effect, but I'm OK with bogus warnings in that
> case.
>
>
> Right, the early returns have worked out surprisingly well and
> __label__ doing fine too. Will keep an eye on it but I think we're OK.
>
>
> OK, then LGTM.
r208394
Cheers
Alp.
> Alp.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com
> <mailto:alp at nuanti.com> <mailto:alp at nuanti.com
> <mailto:alp at nuanti.com>>> wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
>
> On 30/04/2014 06:24, Alp Toker wrote:
>
> Add support for partial jump scope checking. This lets us
> diagnose and perform more complete semantic analysis when
> faced with errors in the function body or declaration.
>
> In particular this improves the interactive editing
> experience
> where jump diagnostics were appearing and disappearing
> as the
> user typed.
>
>
> This patch will also be necessary to support further work
> on goto
> code completion BTW.
>
>
>
> Alp.
>
>
> -- http://www.nuanti.com
> the browser experts
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> <mailto:cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.nuanti.com
> the browser experts
>
>
--
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list