[PATCH] headers: be a bit more careful about inline asm

[Saleem Abdulrasool]

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:

>
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>wrote:
>
>> I think that is perfectly reasonable.  I did do that, but then
>> backtracked away from it.
>
>
> Why did you back away from it?
>

I don't remember why I did ... especially since the rest of the inclusions
are already protected by appropriate checks.  The best reason I can come up
with on a second look is temporary insanity (or perhaps stupidity).

-- 
Saleem Abdulrasool
compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140503/5e45536b/attachment.html>