r206908 - Fix PR19487, PR19505 and PR19506 -- redundant vtordisp thunks when the final overrider is present in both a vbase and nvbase
Timur Iskhodzhanov
timurrrr at google.com
Tue Apr 22 10:32:02 PDT 2014
Author: timurrrr
Date: Tue Apr 22 12:32:02 2014
New Revision: 206908
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=206908&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR19487, PR19505 and PR19506 -- redundant vtordisp thunks when the final overrider is present in both a vbase and nvbase
Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D3449
Modified:
cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp
cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance-vtordisps.cpp
Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp?rev=206908&r1=206907&r2=206908&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp Tue Apr 22 12:32:02 2014
@@ -64,10 +64,14 @@ public:
/// Method - The method decl of the overrider.
const CXXMethodDecl *Method;
+ /// VirtualBase - The virtual base class subobject of this overridder.
+ /// Note that this records the closest derived virtual base class subobject.
+ const CXXRecordDecl *VirtualBase;
+
/// Offset - the base offset of the overrider's parent in the layout class.
CharUnits Offset;
- OverriderInfo() : Method(0), Offset(CharUnits::Zero()) { }
+ OverriderInfo() : Method(0), VirtualBase(0), Offset(CharUnits::Zero()) { }
};
private:
@@ -201,6 +205,7 @@ FinalOverriders::FinalOverriders(const C
Overrider.Offset = OverriderOffset;
Overrider.Method = Method.Method;
+ Overrider.VirtualBase = Method.InVirtualSubobject;
}
}
@@ -2716,20 +2721,10 @@ void VFTableBuilder::CalculateVtordispAd
VBaseMap.find(WhichVFPtr.getVBaseWithVPtr());
assert(VBaseMapEntry != VBaseMap.end());
- // If there's no vtordisp, we don't need any vtordisp adjustment.
- if (!VBaseMapEntry->second.hasVtorDisp())
- return;
-
- const CXXRecordDecl *OverriderRD = Overrider.Method->getParent();
- const CXXRecordDecl *OverriderVBase = 0;
- if (OverriderRD != MostDerivedClass) {
- OverriderVBase =
- ComputeBaseOffset(Context, OverriderRD, MostDerivedClass).VirtualBase;
- }
-
- // If the final overrider is defined in the same vbase as the initial
- // declaration, we don't need a vtordisp thunk at all.
- if (OverriderVBase == WhichVFPtr.getVBaseWithVPtr())
+ // If there's no vtordisp or the final overrider is defined in the same vbase
+ // as the initial declaration, we don't need any vtordisp adjustment.
+ if (!VBaseMapEntry->second.hasVtorDisp() ||
+ Overrider.VirtualBase == WhichVFPtr.getVBaseWithVPtr())
return;
// OK, now we know we need to use a vtordisp thunk.
@@ -2740,7 +2735,8 @@ void VFTableBuilder::CalculateVtordispAd
// A simple vtordisp thunk will suffice if the final overrider is defined
// in either the most derived class or its non-virtual base.
- if (OverriderRD == MostDerivedClass || !OverriderVBase)
+ if (Overrider.Method->getParent() == MostDerivedClass ||
+ !Overrider.VirtualBase)
return;
// Otherwise, we need to do use the dynamic offset of the final overrider
@@ -2750,7 +2746,7 @@ void VFTableBuilder::CalculateVtordispAd
MostDerivedClassLayout.getVBPtrOffset()).getQuantity();
TA.Virtual.Microsoft.VBOffsetOffset =
Context.getTypeSizeInChars(Context.IntTy).getQuantity() *
- VTables.getVBTableIndex(MostDerivedClass, OverriderVBase);
+ VTables.getVBTableIndex(MostDerivedClass, Overrider.VirtualBase);
TA.NonVirtual = (ThisOffset - Overrider.Offset).getQuantity();
}
Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance-vtordisps.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance-vtordisps.cpp?rev=206908&r1=206907&r2=206908&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance-vtordisps.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance-vtordisps.cpp Tue Apr 22 12:32:02 2014
@@ -480,3 +480,58 @@ struct C : virtual B {
C c;
}
+
+namespace pr19505 {
+struct A {
+ virtual void f();
+ virtual void z();
+};
+
+struct B : A {
+ virtual void f();
+};
+
+struct C : A, B {
+ virtual void g();
+};
+
+struct X : B, virtual C {
+ X() {}
+ virtual void g();
+
+ // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'pr19505::A' in 'pr19505::B' in 'pr19505::C' in 'pr19505::X' (2 entries).
+ // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | void pr19505::B::f()
+ // CHECK-NEXT: 1 | void pr19505::A::z()
+
+ // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at pr19505@@6BB at 1@@" = {{.*}}@"\01?f at B@pr19505@@UAEXXZ"
+} x;
+
+void build_vftable(X *obj) { obj->g(); }
+}
+
+namespace pr19506 {
+struct A {
+ virtual void f();
+ virtual void g();
+};
+
+struct B : A {
+ virtual void f();
+};
+
+struct C : B {};
+
+struct X : C, virtual B {
+ virtual void g();
+ X() {}
+
+ // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'pr19506::A' in 'pr19506::B' in 'pr19506::X' (2 entries).
+ // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | void pr19506::B::f()
+ // CHECK-NEXT: 1 | void pr19506::X::g()
+ // CHECK-NEXT: [this adjustment: vtordisp at -4, -12 non-virtual]
+
+ // MANGLING-DAG: @"\01??_7X at pr19506@@6BB at 1@@" = {{.*}}@"\01?f at B@pr19506@@UAEXXZ"
+} x;
+
+void build_vftable(X *obj) { obj->g(); }
+}
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list