r206123 - Tests for DR501-525.

Richard Smith richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Sat Apr 12 17:40:32 PDT 2014


Author: rsmith
Date: Sat Apr 12 19:40:32 2014
New Revision: 206123

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=206123&view=rev
Log:
Tests for DR501-525.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr2xx.cpp
    cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp
    cfe/trunk/www/cxx_dr_status.html

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr2xx.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr2xx.cpp?rev=206123&r1=206122&r2=206123&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr2xx.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr2xx.cpp Sat Apr 12 19:40:32 2014
@@ -686,6 +686,8 @@ namespace dr259 { // dr259: yes c++11
 #endif
 }
 
+// FIXME: When dr260 is resolved, also add tests for DR507.
+
 namespace dr261 { // dr261: no
 #pragma clang diagnostic push
 #pragma clang diagnostic warning "-Wused-but-marked-unused"

Modified: cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp?rev=206123&r1=206122&r2=206123&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Sat Apr 12 19:40:32 2014
@@ -14,4 +14,183 @@ namespace dr500 { // dr500: dup 372
   class D : public A::B {};
 }
 
-// expected-no-diagnostics
+namespace dr501 { // dr501: yes
+  struct A {
+    friend void f() {}
+    void g() {
+      void (*p)() = &f; // expected-error {{undeclared identifier}}
+    }
+  };
+}
+
+namespace dr502 { // dr502: yes
+  struct Q {};
+  template<typename T> struct A {
+    enum E { e = 1 };
+    void q1() { f(e); }
+    void q2() { Q arr[sizeof(E)]; f(arr); }
+    void q3() { Q arr[e]; f(arr); }
+    void sanity() { Q arr[1]; f(arr); } // expected-error {{undeclared identifier 'f'}}
+  };
+  int f(A<int>::E);
+  template<int N> int f(Q (&)[N]);
+  template struct A<int>;
+}
+
+namespace dr505 { // dr505: yes
+  const char *exts = "\e\(\{\[\%"; // expected-error 5{{use of non-standard escape}}
+  const char *unknown = "\Q"; // expected-error {{unknown escape sequence}}
+}
+
+namespace dr506 { // dr506: yes
+  struct NonPod { ~NonPod(); };
+  void f(...);
+  void g(NonPod np) { f(np); } // expected-error {{cannot pass}}
+}
+
+// FIXME: Add tests here once DR260 is resolved.
+// dr507: dup 260
+
+// dr508: na
+// dr509: na
+// dr510: na
+
+namespace dr512 { // dr512: yes
+  struct A {
+    A(int);
+  };
+  union U { A a; };
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+  // expected-error at -2 {{has a non-trivial constructor}}
+  // expected-note at -6 {{no default constructor}}
+  // expected-note at -6 {{suppressed by user-declared constructor}}
+#endif
+}
+
+// dr513: na
+
+namespace dr514 { // dr514: yes
+  namespace A { extern int x, y; }
+  int A::x = y;
+}
+
+namespace dr515 { // dr515: sup 1017
+  // FIXME: dr1017 reverses the wording of dr515, but the current draft has
+  // dr515's wording, with a different fix for dr1017.
+
+  struct X { int n; };
+  template<typename T> struct Y : T {
+    int f() { return X::n; }
+  };
+  int k = Y<X>().f();
+
+  struct A { int a; };
+  struct B { void f() { int k = sizeof(A::a); } };
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+  // expected-error at -2 {{invalid use of non-static data member}}
+#endif
+}
+
+// dr516: na
+
+namespace dr517 { // dr517: no
+  // This is NDR, but we should diagnose it anyway.
+  template<typename T> struct S {};
+  template<typename T> int v = 0; // expected-error 0-1{{extension}}
+
+  template struct S<int*>;
+  template int v<int*>;
+
+  S<char&> s;
+  int k = v<char&>;
+
+  // FIXME: These are both ill-formed.
+  template<typename T> struct S<T*> {};
+  template<typename T> int v<T*> = 0; // expected-error 0-1{{extension}}
+
+  // FIXME: These are both ill-formed.
+  template<typename T> struct S<T&> {};
+  template<typename T> int v<T&> = 0; // expected-error 0-1{{extension}}
+}
+
+namespace dr518 { // dr518: yes c++11
+  enum E { e, };
+#if __cplusplus < 201103L
+  // expected-error at -2 {{C++11 extension}}
+#endif
+}
+
+namespace dr519 { // dr519: yes
+// FIXME: Add a codegen test.
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+#define fold(x) (__builtin_constant_p(x) ? (x) : (x))
+  int test[fold((int*)(void*)0) ? -1 : 1];
+#undef fold
+#endif
+}
+
+// dr520: na
+
+// dr521: no
+// FIXME: The wording here is broken. It's not reasonable to expect a
+// diagnostic here. Once the relevant DR gets a number, mark this as a dup.
+
+namespace dr522 { // dr522: yes
+  struct S {};
+  template<typename T> void b1(volatile T &);
+  template<typename T> void b2(volatile T * const *);
+  template<typename T> void b2(volatile T * const S::*);
+  template<typename T> void b2(volatile T * const S::* const *);
+  // FIXME: This diagnostic isn't very good. The problem is not substitution failure.
+  template<typename T> void b2a(volatile T *S::* const *); // expected-note {{substitution failure}}
+
+  template<typename T> struct Base {};
+  struct Derived : Base<int> {};
+  template<typename T> void b3(Base<T>);
+  template<typename T> void b3(Base<T> *);
+
+  void test(int n, const int cn, int **p, int *S::*pm) {
+    int *a[3], *S::*am[3]; 
+    const Derived cd = Derived();
+    Derived d[3];
+
+    b1(n);
+    b1(cn);
+    b2(p);
+    b2(pm);
+    b2(a);
+    b2(am);
+    b2a(am); // expected-error {{no matching function}}
+    b3(d);
+    b3(cd);
+  }
+}
+
+namespace dr524 { // dr524: yes
+  template<typename T> void f(T a, T b) { operator+(a, b); } // expected-error {{call}}
+
+  struct S {};
+  void operator+(S, S);
+  template void f(S, S);
+
+  namespace N { struct S {}; }
+  void operator+(N::S, N::S); // expected-note {{should be declared}}
+  template void f(N::S, N::S); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
+}
+
+namespace dr525 { // dr525: yes
+  namespace before {
+    // Note, the example was correct prior to the change; instantiation is
+    // required for cases like this:
+    template <class T> struct D { operator T*(); };
+    void g(D<double> ppp) {
+      delete ppp;
+    }
+  }
+  namespace after {
+    template <class T> struct D { typename T::error e; }; // expected-error {{prior to '::'}}
+    void g(D<double> *ppp) {
+      delete ppp; // expected-note {{instantiation of}}
+    }
+  }
+}

Modified: cfe/trunk/www/cxx_dr_status.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/www/cxx_dr_status.html?rev=206123&r1=206122&r2=206123&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/www/cxx_dr_status.html (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/www/cxx_dr_status.html Sat Apr 12 19:40:32 2014
@@ -3047,13 +3047,13 @@ of class templates</td>
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#501">501</a></td>
     <td>NAD</td>
     <td>Visibility of friend declarations within the befriending class</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="502">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#502">502</a></td>
     <td>C++11</td>
     <td>Dependency of nested enumerations and enumerators</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr class="open" id="503">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#503">503</a></td>
@@ -3071,37 +3071,37 @@ of class templates</td>
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#505">505</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Conditionally-supported behavior for unknown character escapes</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="506">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#506">506</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Conditionally-supported behavior for non-POD objects passed to ellipsis</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="507">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#507">507</a></td>
     <td>dup</td>
     <td>Ambiguity assigning class object to built-in type</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="none" align="center">Duplicate of <a href="#260">260</a></td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="508">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#508">508</a></td>
     <td>C++11</td>
     <td>Non-constructed value-initialized objects</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="na" align="center">N/A</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="509">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#509">509</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Dead code in the specification of default initialization</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="na" align="center">N/A</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="510">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#510">510</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Default initialization of POD classes?</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="na" align="center">N/A</td>
   </tr>
   <tr class="open" id="511">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#511">511</a></td>
@@ -3113,67 +3113,67 @@ of class templates</td>
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#512">512</a></td>
     <td>NAD</td>
     <td>Union members with user-declared non-default constructors</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="513">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#513">513</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Non-class “most-derived” objects</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="na" align="center">N/A</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="514">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#514">514</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Is the initializer for a namespace member in the scope of the namespace?</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="515">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#515">515</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Non-dependent references to base class members</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="none" align="center">Superseded by <a href="#1017">1017</a></td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="516">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#516">516</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Use of <TT>signed</TT> in bit-field declarations</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="na" align="center">N/A</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="517">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#517">517</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Partial specialization following explicit instantiation</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="none" align="center">No</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="518">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#518">518</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Trailing comma following <I>enumerator-list</I></td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes (C++11 onwards)</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="519">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#519">519</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Null pointer preservation in <TT>void*</TT> conversions</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="520">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#520">520</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Old-style casts between incomplete class types</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="na" align="center">N/A</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="521">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#521">521</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Requirements for exceptions thrown by allocation functions</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="none" align="center">No</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="522">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#522">522</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Array-to-pointer decay in template argument deduction</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr class="open" id="523">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#523">523</a></td>
@@ -3185,13 +3185,13 @@ of class templates</td>
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#524">524</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Can function-notation calls to operator functions be dependent?</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="525">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#525">525</a></td>
     <td>CD1</td>
     <td>Missing <TT>*</TT> in example</td>
-    <td class="none" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="full" align="center">Yes</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="526">
     <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#526">526</a></td>





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list