[PATCH] Add support for named values in the parser.
Samuel Benzaquen
sbenza at google.com
Mon Apr 7 08:41:53 PDT 2014
================
Comment at: lib/ASTMatchers/Dynamic/Parser.cpp:304
@@ +303,3 @@
+
+ // Parse as a matcher expressoin.
+ return parseMatcherExpressionImpl(NameToken, Value);
----------------
Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Typo: "expression".
Fixed.
================
Comment at: lib/ASTMatchers/Dynamic/Registry.cpp:334
@@ -333,2 +333,3 @@
if (it == RegistryData->constructors().end()) {
- Error->addError(NameRange, Error->ET_RegistryNotFound) << MatcherName;
+ if (Error) {
+ Error->addError(NameRange, Error->ET_RegistryMatcherNotFound)
----------------
Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> I wonder if it would be better to drop the Error parameter from this function (and Sema::lookupMatcherCtor) and move diagnostic emission to the parser. That would be more consistent with how Sema::getNamedValue works, and would also allow you to do both lookups once, in parseIdentifierPrefixImpl.
Yes. It made sense when it was inside constructMatcher, but now it makes more sense outside.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3276
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list