[libcxx] r204778 - Implement LWG issue #2135. If something goes wrong in condition_variable::wait, call terminate() rather than throwing an error. Do this indirectly, by marking the call as 'noexcept'. This is better than just calling terminate() directly, because it gives a better error message on the console.
Marshall Clow
mclow.lists at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 19:45:04 PDT 2014
Author: marshall
Date: Tue Mar 25 21:45:04 2014
New Revision: 204778
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=204778&view=rev
Log:
Implement LWG issue #2135. If something goes wrong in condition_variable::wait, call terminate() rather than throwing an error. Do this indirectly, by marking the call as 'noexcept'. This is better than just calling terminate() directly, because it gives a better error message on the console.
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/include/__mutex_base
libcxx/trunk/src/condition_variable.cpp
libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/__mutex_base
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/__mutex_base?rev=204778&r1=204777&r2=204778&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/include/__mutex_base (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/include/__mutex_base Tue Mar 25 21:45:04 2014
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ public:
void notify_one() _NOEXCEPT;
void notify_all() _NOEXCEPT;
- void wait(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk);
+ void wait(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk) _NOEXCEPT;
template <class _Predicate>
void wait(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk, _Predicate __pred);
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ public:
private:
void __do_timed_wait(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
- chrono::time_point<chrono::system_clock, chrono::nanoseconds>);
+ chrono::time_point<chrono::system_clock, chrono::nanoseconds>) _NOEXCEPT;
};
template <class _To, class _Rep, class _Period>
Modified: libcxx/trunk/src/condition_variable.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/src/condition_variable.cpp?rev=204778&r1=204777&r2=204778&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/src/condition_variable.cpp (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/src/condition_variable.cpp Tue Mar 25 21:45:04 2014
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ condition_variable::notify_all() _NOEXCE
}
void
-condition_variable::wait(unique_lock<mutex>& lk)
+condition_variable::wait(unique_lock<mutex>& lk) _NOEXCEPT
{
if (!lk.owns_lock())
__throw_system_error(EPERM,
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ condition_variable::wait(unique_lock<mut
void
condition_variable::__do_timed_wait(unique_lock<mutex>& lk,
- chrono::time_point<chrono::system_clock, chrono::nanoseconds> tp)
+ chrono::time_point<chrono::system_clock, chrono::nanoseconds> tp) _NOEXCEPT
{
using namespace chrono;
if (!lk.owns_lock())
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html?rev=204778&r1=204777&r2=204778&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html Tue Mar 25 21:45:04 2014
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2300">2300</a></td><td>Redundant sections for map and multimap members should be removed</td><td>Chicago</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td>NB comment: GB9</td> <td>Remove gets from C++14</td><td>Chicago</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2135">2135</a></td><td>Unclear requirement for exceptions thrown in condition_variable::wait()</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2135">2135</a></td><td>Unclear requirement for exceptions thrown in condition_variable::wait()</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2291">2291</a></td><td>std::hash is vulnerable to collision DoS attack</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2142">2142</a></td><td>packaged_task::operator() synchronization too broad?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2240">2240</a></td><td>Probable misuse of term "function scope" in [thread.condition]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list