[libcxx] r204724 - Mark LWG issues #2075 and #2142 as complete. 2142 was a change to the standard

[Marshall Clow]

Author: marshall
Date: Tue Mar 25 09:57:05 2014
New Revision: 204724

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=204724&view=rev
Log:
Mark LWG issues #2075 and #2142 as complete. 2142 was a change to the standard
to remove redundant wording, which required no changes to libc++. 2075 was a 
rewrite of the requirements for forward progress, and again, requires no changes
to the library.

Modified:
    libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html

Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html?rev=204724&r1=204723&r2=204724&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1y_status.html Tue Mar 25 09:57:05 2014
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
     <tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2135">2135</a></td><td>Unclear requirement for exceptions thrown in condition_variable::wait()</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2291">2291</a></td><td>std::hash is vulnerable to collision DoS attack</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2142">2142</a></td><td>packaged_task::operator() synchronization too broad?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2142">2142</a></td><td>packaged_task::operator() synchronization too broad?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2240">2240</a></td><td>Probable misuse of term "function scope" in [thread.condition]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2252">2252</a></td><td>Strong guarantee on vector::push_back() still broken with C++11?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2257">2257</a></td><td>Simplify container requirements with the new algorithms</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
@@ -267,12 +267,12 @@
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2360">2360</a></td><td>reverse_iterator::operator*() is unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2104">2104</a></td><td>unique_lock move-assignment should not be noexcept</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2186">2186</a></td><td>Incomplete action on async/launch::deferred</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
-	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075">2075</a></td><td>Progress guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2075">2075</a></td><td>Progress guarantees, lock-free property, and scheduling assumptions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 	<tr><td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2288">2288</a></td><td>Inconsistent requirements for shared mutexes</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
 <!-- 	<tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr> -->
   </table>
 
-  <p>Last Updated: 24-Mar-2014</p>
+  <p>Last Updated: 25-Mar-2014</p>
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>