r202732 - Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording.

[Reid Kleckner]

Author: rnk
Date: Mon Mar  3 12:22:25 2014
New Revision: 202732

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=202732&view=rev
Log:
Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording.

Modified:
    cfe/trunk/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst

Modified: cfe/trunk/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst?rev=202732&r1=202731&r2=202732&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst Mon Mar  3 12:22:25 2014
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ ABI features
 
 The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features:
 
-* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`.  We've attacked this with a fuzzer,
-  and most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``,
+* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`.  We've tested this with a fuzzer, and
+  most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``,
   ``__declspec(align(N))``, or other pragmas.
 
 * Class inheritance: :good:`Mostly complete`.  This covers all of the standard
@@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ The status of major ABI-impacting C++ fe
 Template instantiation and name lookup
 ======================================
 
-In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs `_, Clang is often unable
-to parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows.  As of this writing,
+In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs`_, Clang is often unable to
+parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows.  As of this writing,
 Clang will reject code with missing ``typename`` annotations:
 
 .. _dependent name lookup FAQs: