[PATCH] [libc++] Do not derive __gnu_cxx::hash<T> from std::hash<T>.

[Peter Collingbourne]

Hi howard.hinnant, mclow.lists,

Instead, define explicit specializations for the basic types listed in
the SGI documentation. This solves two problems:

 1) Helps avoid silent ODR violations caused by the absence of a
    user-supplied __gnu_cxx::hash specialization in cases where a std::hash
    specialization exists (e.g. for std::string).

 2) __gnu_cxx::hash semantics are slightly different to those of
    std::hash (for example, the former may dereference a pointer argument)
    so it is inappropriate for __gnu_cxx::hash to receive std::hash
    specializations by default.

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2747

Files:
  include/ext/__hash

Index: include/ext/__hash
===================================================================
--- include/ext/__hash
+++ include/ext/__hash
@@ -19,8 +19,7 @@
 namespace __gnu_cxx {
 using namespace std;
 
-template <typename _Tp> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash : public std::hash<_Tp>
-    { };
+template <typename _Tp> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash { };
 
 template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<const char*>
     : public unary_function<const char*, size_t>
@@ -41,6 +40,96 @@
         return __do_string_hash<const char *>(__c, __c + strlen(__c));
     }
 };
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<char>
+    : public unary_function<char, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(char __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<signed char>
+    : public unary_function<signed char, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(signed char __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<unsigned char>
+    : public unary_function<unsigned char, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(unsigned char __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<short>
+    : public unary_function<short, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(short __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<unsigned short>
+    : public unary_function<unsigned short, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(unsigned short __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<int>
+    : public unary_function<int, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(int __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<unsigned int>
+    : public unary_function<unsigned int, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(unsigned int __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<long>
+    : public unary_function<long, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(long __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
+
+template <> struct _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY hash<unsigned long>
+    : public unary_function<unsigned long, size_t>
+{
+    _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
+    size_t operator()(unsigned long __c) const _NOEXCEPT
+    {
+        return __c;
+    }
+};
 }
 
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_EXT_HASH
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D2747.1.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2719 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140211/9ff0c817/attachment.bin>