[PATCH] Some infrastructure work for virtual file system

[Chandler Carruth]

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Ben Langmuir <blangmuir at apple.com> wrote:

> On Feb 11, 2014, at 2:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote:
>
> Very cool. A few high level questions:
> - shouldn't the virtual file system go into llvm, not clang?
>
>
> I’m fine with putting this in llvm/Support instead of clang/Basic, but
> we’ll need to check with llvm-dev and the libsupport code owner.  If you
> feel strongly about this I’ll send something to Chandler and llvm-dev.
>

So, one point: code owners don't have a "yes" or "no" to say to something.
We just are responsible for finding a code reviewer if one doesn't show up
to review a patch.

That said, my suggestion is actually to get a good abstraction that you
think *could* move productively to the LLVM support library but is easier
to iterate on in clang/Basic. When you think it's looking good, maybe send
it then?

I just don't want to slow down the reviews with questions like -- how would
LLD use this? How would it interact with X, Y, and Z use case that you
don't (currently) have?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20140211/e84fbd27/attachment.html>