[PATCH] Refactored Clang-tidy for better reusability.
Manuel Klimek
klimek at google.com
Thu Jan 2 01:54:47 PST 2014
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp:156-163
@@ +155,10 @@
+ if (AnalyzerChecksEnabled) {
+ // Run our regex against all possible static analyzer checkers.
+ // Note that debug checkers print values / run programs to visualize the
+ // CFG
+ // and are thus not applicable to clang-tidy in general.
+ // Always add all core checkers if any other static analyzer checks are
+ // enabled. This is currently necessary, as other path sensitive checks
+ // rely
+ // on the core checkers.
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < Checkers.size(); ++i) {
----------------
:gq
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h:107-109
@@ +106,5 @@
+///
+/// FIXME: Ideally we'd want to build a more generic way to use
+/// \c FrontendAction based checkers in clang-tidy, but that needs some
+/// preparation work first.
+class ClangTidyAction : public ASTFrontendAction {
----------------
Why?
================
Comment at: clang-tidy/ClangTidy.h:110
@@ +109,3 @@
+/// preparation work first.
+class ClangTidyAction : public ASTFrontendAction {
+public:
----------------
Description says this was moved to make it easier to create the AST consumer, but it doesn't seem to be used outside of the .cpp. What am I missing?
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2481
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list