[patch] Don't let invalid methods mark their RecordDecl invalid

[Reid Kleckner]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote:

> No, the patch changes things to not mark a class invalid if one of its
> methods is invalid. This was the only place I could find where a class was
> marked invalid after its definition is complete. (Hence with this patch,
> C's superclass A will be valid too, only its method stays invalid, like
> with the first snippet).
>

OK, this makes sense, we already have a complete class, and so far as we
know this is the only place we would mark a record decl invalid after
completing it.  Go for it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131220/4ef8e030/attachment.html>