[PATCH] Refactor duplicate functions

Bernie Ogden bogden at arm.com
Wed Dec 4 02:36:29 PST 2013


Ping

Am I OK to go ahead with this patch? As Renato says 'Mainly that boils down
to: are the added Darwin tests enough to guarantee compatibility?'

Thanks,

Bernie


From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] 
Sent: 23 November 2013 12:34
To: Jim Grosbach
Cc: Bernard Ogden;
reviews+D2243+public+6ca39a6218cf2957 at llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com;
cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Amara Emerson; Eric Christopher
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactor duplicate functions

On 22 November 2013 23:35, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote:
Yeah. It's a long road, and also raises the typical questions of just how
much GCC command line compatibility is worth, etc..

Indeed, but we digressed. ;)

Is the current patch conforming to Darwin usage of arch/march/mcpu? Mainly
that boils down to: are the added Darwin tests enough to guarantee
compatibility?

cheers,
--renato







More information about the cfe-commits mailing list