[PATCH] Better diagnostic for re-initialization of static data members
Hans Wennborg
hans at chromium.org
Wed Nov 20 14:44:14 PST 2013
Hi rsmith,
+richard, because he put in the fixme in test/CXX/drs/dr0xx.cpp:925.
For the following code:
struct S {
static const int x = 42;
};
const int S::x = 42;
This patch changes the diagnostic from:
a.cc:4:14: error: redefinition of 'x'
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:20: note: previous definition is here
static const int x = 42;
^
to:
a.cc:4:18: error: re-initialization of static data member 'x'
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:24: note: previous initialization is here
static const int x = 42;
^
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2235
Files:
include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
test/CXX/class/class.static/class.static.data/p4.cpp
test/CXX/drs/dr0xx.cpp
test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
Index: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
===================================================================
--- include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
+++ include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
@@ -3525,6 +3525,8 @@
def warn_missing_variable_declarations : Warning<
"no previous extern declaration for non-static variable %0">,
InGroup<DiagGroup<"missing-variable-declarations">>, DefaultIgnore;
+def err_static_data_member_reinitialization :
+ Error<"re-initialization of static data member %0">;
def err_redefinition : Error<"redefinition of %0">;
def err_alias_after_tentative :
Error<"alias definition of %0 after tentative definition">;
Index: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -8184,9 +8184,8 @@
// data members we also need to check whether there was an in-class
// declaration with an initializer.
if (VDecl->isStaticDataMember() && VDecl->getAnyInitializer(PrevInit)) {
- Diag(VDecl->getLocation(), diag::err_redefinition)
- << VDecl->getDeclName();
- Diag(PrevInit->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_definition);
+ Diag(Init->getExprLoc(), diag::err_static_data_member_reinitialization) << VDecl->getDeclName();
+ Diag(PrevInit->getInit()->getExprLoc(), diag::note_previous_initializer) << 0;
return;
}
Index: test/CXX/class/class.static/class.static.data/p4.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/CXX/class/class.static/class.static.data/p4.cpp
+++ test/CXX/class/class.static/class.static.data/p4.cpp
@@ -10,15 +10,14 @@
int const OutOfClassInitializerOnly::i = 0;
struct InClassInitializerAndOutOfClassCopyInitializer {
- static const int i = 0; // expected-note{{previous definition is here}}
+ static const int i = 0; // expected-note{{previous initialization is here}}
};
-int const InClassInitializerAndOutOfClassCopyInitializer::i = 0; // expected-error{{redefinition of 'i'}}
+int const InClassInitializerAndOutOfClassCopyInitializer::i = 0; // expected-error{{re-initialization of static data member 'i'}}
struct InClassInitializerAndOutOfClassDirectInitializer {
- static const int i = 0; // expected-note{{previous definition is here}}
+ static const int i = 0; // expected-note{{previous initialization is here}}
};
-int const InClassInitializerAndOutOfClassDirectInitializer::i(0); // expected-error{{redefinition of 'i'}}
-
+int const InClassInitializerAndOutOfClassDirectInitializer::i(0); // expected-error{{re-initialization of static data member 'i'}}
int main() { }
Index: test/CXX/drs/dr0xx.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/CXX/drs/dr0xx.cpp
+++ test/CXX/drs/dr0xx.cpp
@@ -919,11 +919,10 @@
namespace dr88 { // dr88: yes
template<typename T> struct S {
- static const int a = 1;
+ static const int a = 1; // expected-note {{previous}}
static const int b;
};
- // FIXME: This diagnostic is pretty bad.
- template<> const int S<int>::a = 4; // expected-error {{redefinition}} expected-note {{previous}}
+ template<> const int S<int>::a = 4; // expected-error {{re-initialization}}
template<> const int S<int>::b = 4;
}
Index: test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
===================================================================
--- test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
+++ test/SemaCXX/cxx1y-variable-templates_in_class.cpp
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@
template<typename T> CONST T B1::right<T,int> = T(5);
class B2 {
- template<typename T, typename T0> static CONST T right = T(100); // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
- template<typename T> static CONST T right<T,int> = T(5); // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
+ template<typename T, typename T0> static CONST T right = T(100); // expected-note {{previous initialization is here}}
+ template<typename T> static CONST T right<T,int> = T(5); // expected-note {{previous initialization is here}}
};
- template<typename T, typename T0> CONST T B2::right = T(100); // expected-error {{redefinition of 'right'}}
- template<typename T> CONST T B2::right<T,int> = T(5); // expected-error {{redefinition of 'right'}}
+ template<typename T, typename T0> CONST T B2::right = T(100); // expected-error {{re-initialization of static data member 'right'}}
+ template<typename T> CONST T B2::right<T,int> = T(5); // expected-error {{re-initialization of static data member 'right'}}
class B3 {
template<typename T, typename T0> static CONST T right = T(100);
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D2235.1.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4696 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131120/29d25530/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list