[patch] Handle the fact that typedefs define free functions

[Richard Smith]

Thanks, LGTM

I think we have that exact same set of checks somewhere else, can we
refactor this to be a method on Declarator?


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> The attached patch is a follow up from my previous one. The existing
> logic was not handling typedefs as free functions. This was not
> causing problems with the existing tests, but does with the microsoft
> abi where they have to get a different calling convention.
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131118/4d02af07/attachment.html>