[PATCH] extra libclang functionality for the xdress project

[Anthony Scopatz]

On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Alp Toker <alp at nuanti.com> wrote:

>
> On 06/11/2013 14:55, Anthony Scopatz wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Could we please hear some response on this?  Thanks!
>
> Hello Anthony, Geoffrey,
>
> Thanks for the contribution.
>
> You'll need to rebase this work against current SVN, add at least a
> couple of standard lit tests and probably split it up into two or three
> bite-size chunks for review.
>
> Once that's done, it can also help to CC in others who've recently
> worked on the C API in order to get buy-in.
>

Thanks Alp,

Do you have any suggestions on who to CC or should we just look at the logs?

Thanks!

Be Well
Anthony


>
> As for the Geoffrey's build problem, it's best to ask that as a separate
> question, including details about the platform and configuration if
> you're still struggling.
>
> Good luck with the patch :-)
>
> Alp.
>
>
>
> >
> > Be Well
> > Anthony
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Geoffrey Irving <irving at naml.us
> > <mailto:irving at naml.us>> wrote:
> >
> >     Here are four patches improving libclang in various ways for use in
> >     xdress (http://xdress.org).  In order, they add
> >
> >     1. Python support for clang_formatDiagnostic.
> >     2. Access to public / private / protected specifiers.
> >     3. Template argument access (as new cursor types).
> >     4. A clang_Cursor_getDefaultArgument function.
> >
> >     They've all been tested inside xdress, but the patches themselves do
> >     not include tests.  Since questions about this stuff to cfe-dev were
> >     ignored, I want to make sure these patches will be looked at before I
> >     do potentially unnecessary work.
> >
> >     Caveat: llvm trunk does not build for me due to these errors:
> >
> >         llvm-build: error: invalid native target: 'x86_64' (not in
> >     project)
> >
> >     Therefore, these patches were written, built, and tested again
> >     release_33 plus several cherry-picked libclang commits.  It's
> possible
> >     they don't compile against the trunk.
> >
> >     Any ideas what would have caused this build breakage since
> release_33?
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Geoffrey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cfe-commits mailing list
> > cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
> --
> http://www.nuanti.com
> the browser experts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131106/13d95d61/attachment.html>