[PATCH] Replaced bool parameters in SkipUntil function with single bit-based parameter.
Alexey Bataev
a.bataev at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 6 02:27:41 PST 2013
Hi David,
I need to add another one boolean parameter for OpenMP pragmas parsing
to skip counting braces/brackets/parens and Hal Finkel proposed to
convert all these booleans into a bit-based single parameter.
Best regards,
Alexey Bataev
=============
Software Engineer
Intel Compiler Team
Intel Corp.
> Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:24:26 +0400
> From: a.bataev at hotmail.com
> To: reviews+D2108+public+7ef5c38906feb203 at llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com; dgregor at apple.com; cbergstrom at pathscale.com; hfinkel at anl.gov
> CC: cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; david.majnemer at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replaced bool parameters in SkipUntil function with single bit-based parameter.
>
> Hi David,
> I need to add another one boolean parameter for OpenMP pragmas parsing
> to skip counting braces/brackets/parens and Hal Finkel proposed to
> convert all these booleans into a bit-based single parameter.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexey Bataev
> =============
> Software Engineer
> Intel Compiler Team
> Intel Corp.
>
> 06.11.2013 14:10, David Majnemer пишет:
> > From my experience,
> > `SkipUntil(EndKind, /*StopAtSemi=*/true, /*DontConsume=*/true);`
> > is more typical in clang than
> > `SkipUntil(EndKind, StopAtSemi | DontConsume);`
> >
> > It seems that some of the calls that you changed were previously nasty (i.e. `SkipUntil(EndKind, true, true)`) which justifies a cleanup.
> > However I'm not sure we want a bitfield here.
> >
> > What is your justification?
> >
> >
> > ================
> > Comment at: include/clang/Parse/Parser.h:751
> > @@ -741,3 +750,3 @@
> > /// token will ever occur, this skips to the next token, or to some likely
> > - /// good stopping point. If StopAtSemi is true, skipping will stop at a ';'
> > - /// character.
> > + /// good stopping point. If Flags has bit set at StopAtSemi, skipping will
> > + /// stop at a ';' character.
> > ----------------
> > The wording "has bit set" seems strange.
> >
> >
> > http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2108
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131106/394efa82/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list