[llvm] r193350 - Reverting my r193344 checkin due to build breakage.

[Michael Gottesman]

We do use it internally and can not remove the dependency.

Michael

On Oct 24, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Michael Gottesman <mgottesman at apple.com> wrote:

> The reason why we are building it in phase 1 is we build it so internally. Let me chat with Bob.
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:29 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <kyrtzidis at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis <kyrtzidis at apple.com> wrote:
>>> Asking people to update clang-tools-extra is fine, that's why I believe there should be a buildbot building it, but phase 1 is the highest priority, any breaking window should be at a minimum; phase 1 should build the code that everyone committing changes is building, not include repositories that are out of the core repositories.
>>> 
>>> Are LLD or LLDB outside of the core repositories?
>> 
>> These are not build by phase 1.
>> 
>>> 
>>> A reasonable number of Clang developers are working heavily on the tools. I don't understand why it isn't one of the core repositories.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20131031/4762893c/attachment.html>